+- AOP Forum (https://forum.aopwiki.org)
+-- Forum: AOP-Wiki Forum (https://forum.aopwiki.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: AOP-Wiki features (https://forum.aopwiki.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=20)
+---- Forum: Desirable AOP-Wiki features (https://forum.aopwiki.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=22)
+---- Thread: qAOP tagging (/showthread.php?tid=207)
qAOP tagging - DanV-AOP - 26 May 2023
A suggestion to tag AOPs that have sufficient quantitative understanding or aligned computational models to facilitate their use for quantitative applications (suggestion from webinar 1).
RE: qAOP tagging - JasonOBrien - 26 May 2023
(26 May 2023, 13:02)DanV-AOP Wrote: A suggestion to tag AOPs that have sufficient quantitative understanding or aligned computational models to facilitate their use for quantitative applications (suggestion from webinar 1).
I like idea of easily being able to identify "model-able" KERs and AOPs
Perhaps a similar suggestion is to revise the "quantitative understanding WOE score" evaluation process, so that only AOPs with sufficient quantitative information receive a score of "medium" or "high". This will require clear definitions of what "sufficient quantitative information" actually means
A "tag" for KERs/AOPs that already have actual computation models associated with them could be helpful.
Perhaps instead of a "tag", we could create a field that (very briefly!!) describes any available models and where they can be found (e.g. a link to a paper or database).
Then we wouldnt need a "tag" per se.... we could just look for KERs and AOPs where this field is not empty
but overall, agree that easily finding this information would be very useful