02 Mar 2022, 14:32
I am working with your latest released (https://aopwiki.org/downloads/aop-wiki-xml-2022-01-01.gz) dump and I've noticed missing or different information in it when compared to your website.
As an example, the AOP nº 69(https://aopwiki.org/aops/69#taxonomic_applicability) lists to be applicable on rats and humans.
On the XML, this AOP ID only has a taxonomic reference:
"<taxonomy-reference id="3cf5bab0-bfa0-48db-9347-ebd8fdbaea9e" aop-wiki-id="69"/>"
pointing to rats:
```
<taxonomy id="3cf5bab0-bfa0-48db-9347-ebd8fdbaea9e">
<source-id>10116</source-id>
<source>NCBI</source>
<name>rats</name>
```
Another example is AOP nº 202(https://aopwiki.org/aops/202#taxonomic_applicability)for which there is no taxonomic reference at all in the XML whereas the webpage says it has humans applicability.
Could you please tell me if I am processing the data in an incorrect way or what is the source of this difference?
Many thanks for your help.
Best,
Irene López
As an example, the AOP nº 69(https://aopwiki.org/aops/69#taxonomic_applicability) lists to be applicable on rats and humans.
On the XML, this AOP ID only has a taxonomic reference:
"<taxonomy-reference id="3cf5bab0-bfa0-48db-9347-ebd8fdbaea9e" aop-wiki-id="69"/>"
pointing to rats:
```
<taxonomy id="3cf5bab0-bfa0-48db-9347-ebd8fdbaea9e">
<source-id>10116</source-id>
<source>NCBI</source>
<name>rats</name>
```
Another example is AOP nº 202(https://aopwiki.org/aops/202#taxonomic_applicability)for which there is no taxonomic reference at all in the XML whereas the webpage says it has humans applicability.
Could you please tell me if I am processing the data in an incorrect way or what is the source of this difference?
Many thanks for your help.
Best,
Irene López